Auf Planeten nach oben werfen
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
Need help? Yes, please!
The following quantities appear in the problem:
Zeit \(t\) / Masse \(m\) / Energie \(E\) / Geschwindigkeit \(v\) / Strecke \(s\) / Beschleunigung \(a\) / Ortsfaktor \(g\) / Höhe \(h\) /
The following formulas must be used to solve the exercise:
\(v = v_0 + at \quad \) \(s = \dfrac{1}{2}at^2+v_0 t \quad \) \(s = \dfrac{v^2-v_0^2}{2a} \quad \) \(E_{\rm \scriptscriptstyle kin} = \dfrac12 mv^2 \quad \) \(E_{\rm \scriptscriptstyle pot} = mgh \quad \)
No explanation / solution video for this exercise has yet been created.
But there is a video to a similar exercise:
In case your browser prevents YouTube embedding: https://youtu.be/5pje6h6xIyM
But there is a video to a similar exercise:
Exercise:
Ein Astronaut wirft auf einem fremden Himmelskörper eine kleine Stahlkugel mit vO vertikal nach oben. Sie erreicht nach sO den höchsten Punkt. Welche Fallbeschleunigung errechnet man daraus für diesen Himmelskörper?
Solution:
g fracv^s fracqtyv^ s g approx gS
Ein Astronaut wirft auf einem fremden Himmelskörper eine kleine Stahlkugel mit vO vertikal nach oben. Sie erreicht nach sO den höchsten Punkt. Welche Fallbeschleunigung errechnet man daraus für diesen Himmelskörper?
Solution:
g fracv^s fracqtyv^ s g approx gS
Meta Information
Exercise:
Ein Astronaut wirft auf einem fremden Himmelskörper eine kleine Stahlkugel mit vO vertikal nach oben. Sie erreicht nach sO den höchsten Punkt. Welche Fallbeschleunigung errechnet man daraus für diesen Himmelskörper?
Solution:
g fracv^s fracqtyv^ s g approx gS
Ein Astronaut wirft auf einem fremden Himmelskörper eine kleine Stahlkugel mit vO vertikal nach oben. Sie erreicht nach sO den höchsten Punkt. Welche Fallbeschleunigung errechnet man daraus für diesen Himmelskörper?
Solution:
g fracv^s fracqtyv^ s g approx gS
Contained in these collections
-
Freier Fall 3. Formel by TeXercises
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Stein zum Boden werfen | tags |
| Körper nach unten schleudern | tags |
| Fallexperiment von Astronaut | tags |
| Körper nach unten schleudern | tags |
| Kollision vs. frei fallen | tags |
Similar exercises (30)
| Title | Matched on |
|---|---|
| Stein zum Boden werfen | tags |
| Körper nach unten schleudern | tags |
| Fallexperiment von Astronaut | tags |
| Körper nach unten schleudern | tags |
| Kollision vs. frei fallen | tags |
| Aus Hubschrauber fallen lassen | tags |
| Landen wie Fallschirmspringer | tags |
| Schlüsselbund nach unten werfen | tags |
| Steighöhe von Flabgeschoss | tags |
| Körper nach oben werfen | tags |
| Körper nach unten schleudern | tags |
| Stahlkugel | tags |
| Sportgymnastik | tags |
| Nach unten werfen | tags |
| Frei fallender Körper | tags |
| Astronauten | tags |
| Vulkan Ätna | tags |
| Nach unten werfen | tags |
| Zwei Körper | tags |
| Burj Khalifa Bin Zayed | tags |
| Steamboat-Geysir | tags |
| Stein von Brücke aufwärts werfen (v2) | tags |
| Stein fällt vom Turm | tags |
| Eiffelturm - senkrecht werfen | tags |
| Stein von Brücke aufwärts werfen | tags |
| Stein vom Creux du Van aufwärts werfen | tags |
| Stein von Brücke werfen | tags |
| Kind wirft Stein | tags |
| Körper vertikal wegschleudern | tags |
| Abwurf eines Hilfspakets | tags |