Force between Uniformly Charged Parallel Wires
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Two wires with charges pm Q are placed parallel to each other. We ase that the distance d between the wires is small compared to their length. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:forcbetween-parallel-wires-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force between the wires. abc Calculate the force between the wires for a charge pmQO a length LO and a distance dO. Compare the result to the result predicted by Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The field of the positive wire at the position of the negative wire is given by E_+ fracpivarepsilon_fraclambda_+d fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d Since the field is constant along the negative wire both in magnitude and direction the force experienced by the negative wire is F_- abs-Q E_+ Q fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d fracpivarepsilon_fracQ^ell d The direction of the force is in the opposite direction of the field lines going from the positive to the negative wire i.e. towards the positive wire. vspacemm The force acting on the positive wire is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction which is in agreement with Newton's third law actioreactio. abc The force is F FF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^Ltimesd F approx resultFP- Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance yields F_C FCF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^leftdright^ FC approx resultFCP- which is much greater than the force between the two wires. This can be explained with the fact that the partial forces between charges on the positive and charges on the negative wire are much weaker on average larger distance and have a component parallel to the wire that is cancelled because of the symmetry of the setup. abcliste
Two wires with charges pm Q are placed parallel to each other. We ase that the distance d between the wires is small compared to their length. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:forcbetween-parallel-wires-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force between the wires. abc Calculate the force between the wires for a charge pmQO a length LO and a distance dO. Compare the result to the result predicted by Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The field of the positive wire at the position of the negative wire is given by E_+ fracpivarepsilon_fraclambda_+d fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d Since the field is constant along the negative wire both in magnitude and direction the force experienced by the negative wire is F_- abs-Q E_+ Q fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d fracpivarepsilon_fracQ^ell d The direction of the force is in the opposite direction of the field lines going from the positive to the negative wire i.e. towards the positive wire. vspacemm The force acting on the positive wire is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction which is in agreement with Newton's third law actioreactio. abc The force is F FF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^Ltimesd F approx resultFP- Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance yields F_C FCF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^leftdright^ FC approx resultFCP- which is much greater than the force between the two wires. This can be explained with the fact that the partial forces between charges on the positive and charges on the negative wire are much weaker on average larger distance and have a component parallel to the wire that is cancelled because of the symmetry of the setup. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
Two wires with charges pm Q are placed parallel to each other. We ase that the distance d between the wires is small compared to their length. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:forcbetween-parallel-wires-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force between the wires. abc Calculate the force between the wires for a charge pmQO a length LO and a distance dO. Compare the result to the result predicted by Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The field of the positive wire at the position of the negative wire is given by E_+ fracpivarepsilon_fraclambda_+d fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d Since the field is constant along the negative wire both in magnitude and direction the force experienced by the negative wire is F_- abs-Q E_+ Q fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d fracpivarepsilon_fracQ^ell d The direction of the force is in the opposite direction of the field lines going from the positive to the negative wire i.e. towards the positive wire. vspacemm The force acting on the positive wire is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction which is in agreement with Newton's third law actioreactio. abc The force is F FF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^Ltimesd F approx resultFP- Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance yields F_C FCF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^leftdright^ FC approx resultFCP- which is much greater than the force between the two wires. This can be explained with the fact that the partial forces between charges on the positive and charges on the negative wire are much weaker on average larger distance and have a component parallel to the wire that is cancelled because of the symmetry of the setup. abcliste
Two wires with charges pm Q are placed parallel to each other. We ase that the distance d between the wires is small compared to their length. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:forcbetween-parallel-wires-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force between the wires. abc Calculate the force between the wires for a charge pmQO a length LO and a distance dO. Compare the result to the result predicted by Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The field of the positive wire at the position of the negative wire is given by E_+ fracpivarepsilon_fraclambda_+d fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d Since the field is constant along the negative wire both in magnitude and direction the force experienced by the negative wire is F_- abs-Q E_+ Q fracpivarepsilon_fracQell d fracpivarepsilon_fracQ^ell d The direction of the force is in the opposite direction of the field lines going from the positive to the negative wire i.e. towards the positive wire. vspacemm The force acting on the positive wire is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction which is in agreement with Newton's third law actioreactio. abc The force is F FF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^Ltimesd F approx resultFP- Coulomb's law for two po charges at the same distance yields F_C FCF fracpitimesncepsfracleftQright^leftdright^ FC approx resultFCP- which is much greater than the force between the two wires. This can be explained with the fact that the partial forces between charges on the positive and charges on the negative wire are much weaker on average larger distance and have a component parallel to the wire that is cancelled because of the symmetry of the setup. abcliste
Contained in these collections:

