Light Bulbs in Series and in Parallel
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Using the current vs. voltage characteristic for a light bulb see figure determine the current you would expect for a two light bulbs in parallel and b two light bulbs in series connected to a voltage of VO. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:light-bulb-i-vs-v-# center
Solution:
abcliste abc The light bulbs in parallel are both connected to the full voltage. From the diagram we read a current I_pIpO. This is the current per light bulb so the total current is sscItot IaF times Ip resultIaP abc For the light bulbs in series the total voltage is split up. Since the light bulbs are ased to be identical the voltage is split up evenly i.e. there is half the total voltage per light bulb. The current for VsO can be read from the diagram: resultI_sIsO. The two light bulbs are in series so this is the total current. abcliste
Using the current vs. voltage characteristic for a light bulb see figure determine the current you would expect for a two light bulbs in parallel and b two light bulbs in series connected to a voltage of VO. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:light-bulb-i-vs-v-# center
Solution:
abcliste abc The light bulbs in parallel are both connected to the full voltage. From the diagram we read a current I_pIpO. This is the current per light bulb so the total current is sscItot IaF times Ip resultIaP abc For the light bulbs in series the total voltage is split up. Since the light bulbs are ased to be identical the voltage is split up evenly i.e. there is half the total voltage per light bulb. The current for VsO can be read from the diagram: resultI_sIsO. The two light bulbs are in series so this is the total current. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
Using the current vs. voltage characteristic for a light bulb see figure determine the current you would expect for a two light bulbs in parallel and b two light bulbs in series connected to a voltage of VO. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:light-bulb-i-vs-v-# center
Solution:
abcliste abc The light bulbs in parallel are both connected to the full voltage. From the diagram we read a current I_pIpO. This is the current per light bulb so the total current is sscItot IaF times Ip resultIaP abc For the light bulbs in series the total voltage is split up. Since the light bulbs are ased to be identical the voltage is split up evenly i.e. there is half the total voltage per light bulb. The current for VsO can be read from the diagram: resultI_sIsO. The two light bulbs are in series so this is the total current. abcliste
Using the current vs. voltage characteristic for a light bulb see figure determine the current you would expect for a two light bulbs in parallel and b two light bulbs in series connected to a voltage of VO. center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:light-bulb-i-vs-v-# center
Solution:
abcliste abc The light bulbs in parallel are both connected to the full voltage. From the diagram we read a current I_pIpO. This is the current per light bulb so the total current is sscItot IaF times Ip resultIaP abc For the light bulbs in series the total voltage is split up. Since the light bulbs are ased to be identical the voltage is split up evenly i.e. there is half the total voltage per light bulb. The current for VsO can be read from the diagram: resultI_sIsO. The two light bulbs are in series so this is the total current. abcliste
Contained in these collections:

