Skylab Body Mass Device
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
Normal bathroom scales do not work on the International Space Station ISS. Still it is relevant for astronauts staying there for up to several months to regularly measure their mass. This can be done with a chair susped from several springs forming a simple mass chair and astronaut on a spring system. The figure below shows the system that was used in the Skylab module. It is now on display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:skylab-body-mass-device# center For astronaut Tamara Jernigan an oscillation period of TCAO was measured. The empty chair mCO oscillates with a period of TCO. abcliste abc Determine Tamara’s mass at the time this measurement was taken. abc Why do normal bathroom scales not work on the ISS? Why is regularly measuring the body mass relevant for astronauts? abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The period for a mass on a spring system is given by T fracpiomega pisqrtfracmk The ratio of the period for the chair and the astronaut to the period of the empty chair is fracsscTC+AsscTC sqrtfracsscmA+sscmCsscmC where sscmC is the mass of the empty chair and sscmA the mass of the astronaut. Solving for the mass of the astronaut leads to sscmA mAF mCtimesleftleftfracTCATCright^-right mA approx resultmAP abc Normal bathroom scales measure the normal force acting on the platform of the scale. On the ISS the astronauts are in a constant free fall i.e. the gravitational force keeps them on their orbit around the Earth. The astronauts are floating in the space station no normal force would act on a normal scale. Measuring the body mass is important because in a weightless state there is barely any work done by the mussles so astronauts t to lose mussle mass during their time in the space station. abcliste
Normal bathroom scales do not work on the International Space Station ISS. Still it is relevant for astronauts staying there for up to several months to regularly measure their mass. This can be done with a chair susped from several springs forming a simple mass chair and astronaut on a spring system. The figure below shows the system that was used in the Skylab module. It is now on display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:skylab-body-mass-device# center For astronaut Tamara Jernigan an oscillation period of TCAO was measured. The empty chair mCO oscillates with a period of TCO. abcliste abc Determine Tamara’s mass at the time this measurement was taken. abc Why do normal bathroom scales not work on the ISS? Why is regularly measuring the body mass relevant for astronauts? abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The period for a mass on a spring system is given by T fracpiomega pisqrtfracmk The ratio of the period for the chair and the astronaut to the period of the empty chair is fracsscTC+AsscTC sqrtfracsscmA+sscmCsscmC where sscmC is the mass of the empty chair and sscmA the mass of the astronaut. Solving for the mass of the astronaut leads to sscmA mAF mCtimesleftleftfracTCATCright^-right mA approx resultmAP abc Normal bathroom scales measure the normal force acting on the platform of the scale. On the ISS the astronauts are in a constant free fall i.e. the gravitational force keeps them on their orbit around the Earth. The astronauts are floating in the space station no normal force would act on a normal scale. Measuring the body mass is important because in a weightless state there is barely any work done by the mussles so astronauts t to lose mussle mass during their time in the space station. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
Normal bathroom scales do not work on the International Space Station ISS. Still it is relevant for astronauts staying there for up to several months to regularly measure their mass. This can be done with a chair susped from several springs forming a simple mass chair and astronaut on a spring system. The figure below shows the system that was used in the Skylab module. It is now on display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:skylab-body-mass-device# center For astronaut Tamara Jernigan an oscillation period of TCAO was measured. The empty chair mCO oscillates with a period of TCO. abcliste abc Determine Tamara’s mass at the time this measurement was taken. abc Why do normal bathroom scales not work on the ISS? Why is regularly measuring the body mass relevant for astronauts? abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The period for a mass on a spring system is given by T fracpiomega pisqrtfracmk The ratio of the period for the chair and the astronaut to the period of the empty chair is fracsscTC+AsscTC sqrtfracsscmA+sscmCsscmC where sscmC is the mass of the empty chair and sscmA the mass of the astronaut. Solving for the mass of the astronaut leads to sscmA mAF mCtimesleftleftfracTCATCright^-right mA approx resultmAP abc Normal bathroom scales measure the normal force acting on the platform of the scale. On the ISS the astronauts are in a constant free fall i.e. the gravitational force keeps them on their orbit around the Earth. The astronauts are floating in the space station no normal force would act on a normal scale. Measuring the body mass is important because in a weightless state there is barely any work done by the mussles so astronauts t to lose mussle mass during their time in the space station. abcliste
Normal bathroom scales do not work on the International Space Station ISS. Still it is relevant for astronauts staying there for up to several months to regularly measure their mass. This can be done with a chair susped from several springs forming a simple mass chair and astronaut on a spring system. The figure below shows the system that was used in the Skylab module. It is now on display in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:skylab-body-mass-device# center For astronaut Tamara Jernigan an oscillation period of TCAO was measured. The empty chair mCO oscillates with a period of TCO. abcliste abc Determine Tamara’s mass at the time this measurement was taken. abc Why do normal bathroom scales not work on the ISS? Why is regularly measuring the body mass relevant for astronauts? abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The period for a mass on a spring system is given by T fracpiomega pisqrtfracmk The ratio of the period for the chair and the astronaut to the period of the empty chair is fracsscTC+AsscTC sqrtfracsscmA+sscmCsscmC where sscmC is the mass of the empty chair and sscmA the mass of the astronaut. Solving for the mass of the astronaut leads to sscmA mAF mCtimesleftleftfracTCATCright^-right mA approx resultmAP abc Normal bathroom scales measure the normal force acting on the platform of the scale. On the ISS the astronauts are in a constant free fall i.e. the gravitational force keeps them on their orbit around the Earth. The astronauts are floating in the space station no normal force would act on a normal scale. Measuring the body mass is important because in a weightless state there is barely any work done by the mussles so astronauts t to lose mussle mass during their time in the space station. abcliste
Contained in these collections:
-
Simple Harmonic Motion by by
-

