Wire in Radial Field
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
A short wire with charge q is placed in the radial field produced by a cylindrical rod carrying a charge Q see figure. The orientation of the wire is along the field lines of the radial field i.e. perpicular to the rod. The charge q is much smaller than Q so that it does not affect the charge distribution in the rod. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsetup-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force on the wire. abc Calculate the force acting on a wire with length lO and charge qO in the field of a rod with charge QO and length LO for a distance dO. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The electric field due to the charged rod at a distance x from the rod is given by Ex fracpivarepsilon_fraclambdax fracQpivarepsilon_ L x The force on a short segment of the wire with charge textdq at distance x from the rod is see figure textdF Ex textdq center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsolution-# center For a uniform charge distribution in the wire the charge of the segment can be written as textdq fracqell textdx where textdx is the length of the segment. vspacemm Since the force on a segment deps on the distance from the rod we have to egrate the force along the wire: F _d-ell/^d+ell/ Ex fracqell textdx _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQpivarepsilon_ L x fracqell textdx fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracx textdx The antiderivative of /x is ln x hence F fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left ln x right_d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left lnleftd+fracellright - lnleftd-fracellright right fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell lnleftfracd+fracelld-fracellright FF abc The force on the wire is F FF fracQtimesqpitimesncepstimesLtimesl &quad quad timeslnleftfractimesd+ltimesd-lright F approx resultFP- abcliste
A short wire with charge q is placed in the radial field produced by a cylindrical rod carrying a charge Q see figure. The orientation of the wire is along the field lines of the radial field i.e. perpicular to the rod. The charge q is much smaller than Q so that it does not affect the charge distribution in the rod. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsetup-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force on the wire. abc Calculate the force acting on a wire with length lO and charge qO in the field of a rod with charge QO and length LO for a distance dO. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The electric field due to the charged rod at a distance x from the rod is given by Ex fracpivarepsilon_fraclambdax fracQpivarepsilon_ L x The force on a short segment of the wire with charge textdq at distance x from the rod is see figure textdF Ex textdq center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsolution-# center For a uniform charge distribution in the wire the charge of the segment can be written as textdq fracqell textdx where textdx is the length of the segment. vspacemm Since the force on a segment deps on the distance from the rod we have to egrate the force along the wire: F _d-ell/^d+ell/ Ex fracqell textdx _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQpivarepsilon_ L x fracqell textdx fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracx textdx The antiderivative of /x is ln x hence F fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left ln x right_d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left lnleftd+fracellright - lnleftd-fracellright right fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell lnleftfracd+fracelld-fracellright FF abc The force on the wire is F FF fracQtimesqpitimesncepstimesLtimesl &quad quad timeslnleftfractimesd+ltimesd-lright F approx resultFP- abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
A short wire with charge q is placed in the radial field produced by a cylindrical rod carrying a charge Q see figure. The orientation of the wire is along the field lines of the radial field i.e. perpicular to the rod. The charge q is much smaller than Q so that it does not affect the charge distribution in the rod. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsetup-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force on the wire. abc Calculate the force acting on a wire with length lO and charge qO in the field of a rod with charge QO and length LO for a distance dO. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The electric field due to the charged rod at a distance x from the rod is given by Ex fracpivarepsilon_fraclambdax fracQpivarepsilon_ L x The force on a short segment of the wire with charge textdq at distance x from the rod is see figure textdF Ex textdq center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsolution-# center For a uniform charge distribution in the wire the charge of the segment can be written as textdq fracqell textdx where textdx is the length of the segment. vspacemm Since the force on a segment deps on the distance from the rod we have to egrate the force along the wire: F _d-ell/^d+ell/ Ex fracqell textdx _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQpivarepsilon_ L x fracqell textdx fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracx textdx The antiderivative of /x is ln x hence F fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left ln x right_d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left lnleftd+fracellright - lnleftd-fracellright right fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell lnleftfracd+fracelld-fracellright FF abc The force on the wire is F FF fracQtimesqpitimesncepstimesLtimesl &quad quad timeslnleftfractimesd+ltimesd-lright F approx resultFP- abcliste
A short wire with charge q is placed in the radial field produced by a cylindrical rod carrying a charge Q see figure. The orientation of the wire is along the field lines of the radial field i.e. perpicular to the rod. The charge q is much smaller than Q so that it does not affect the charge distribution in the rod. center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsetup-# center abcliste abc Derive a formal expression for the force on the wire. abc Calculate the force acting on a wire with length lO and charge qO in the field of a rod with charge QO and length LO for a distance dO. abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The electric field due to the charged rod at a distance x from the rod is given by Ex fracpivarepsilon_fraclambdax fracQpivarepsilon_ L x The force on a short segment of the wire with charge textdq at distance x from the rod is see figure textdF Ex textdq center includegraphicswidthcm#image_path:perpicular-wirsolution-# center For a uniform charge distribution in the wire the charge of the segment can be written as textdq fracqell textdx where textdx is the length of the segment. vspacemm Since the force on a segment deps on the distance from the rod we have to egrate the force along the wire: F _d-ell/^d+ell/ Ex fracqell textdx _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQpivarepsilon_ L x fracqell textdx fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell _d-ell/^d+ell/ fracx textdx The antiderivative of /x is ln x hence F fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left ln x right_d-ell/^d+ell/ fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell left lnleftd+fracellright - lnleftd-fracellright right fracQ qpivarepsilon_ L ell lnleftfracd+fracelld-fracellright FF abc The force on the wire is F FF fracQtimesqpitimesncepstimesLtimesl &quad quad timeslnleftfractimesd+ltimesd-lright F approx resultFP- abcliste
Contained in these collections:
-
-
Electric Field by by

