Charged Plate
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
A circular plate carries a uniform charge distribution with a total charge of Q. Derive a formal expression for the electric field at a po located along the central axis of the disc. Additionally discuss the case where the diameter of the plate is much greater than the distance from the plate.
Solution:
We divide the circular plate o concentric rings. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:charged-plat# center The ring with radius r and width dr see figure produces an electric field dE at a po P with see field of charged ring dE k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ Since the plate is uniformly charged the charge dQ can be expressed in terms of the total charge Q fracdQQ fracdAA fracpi r drpi R^ Longrightarrow dQ Q frac r drR^ where the expression dQ pi r dr is valid in the limit dr to . vspacemm The total electric field can be calculated by adding up the partial contributions of all rings. In the limit dr to this corresponds to the egral: E _^R dE _^R k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ k_C d _^R fracQleftr^+d^right^/ frac r drR^ k_C frac Q dR^ _^R fracrleftr^+d^right^/ dr The antiderivative of the function fr fracrleftr^+d^right^/ is given by Fr -fracleftr^+d^right^/ as can be verified by taking the derivative of Fr: F'rfr. It follows for the electric field E k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftr^+d^right^/right_^R k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftR^+d^right^/+fracleftd^right^/right k_C frac Q dR^ left fracd-fracsqrtR^+d^right k_C frac QR^ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right With k_C /pi varepsilon_ this can be written as Ed fracQpi R^varepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracvarepsilon_ fracQA left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracsigmavarepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right with the surface charge density sigmaQ/A. vspacemm If R gg d the second term in the parentheses ts to zero since R/d ts to infinity. The field can thus be approximated as E &approx fracsigmavarepsilon_ This means that the field of an infinetly large plate does not dep on the distance from the plate.
A circular plate carries a uniform charge distribution with a total charge of Q. Derive a formal expression for the electric field at a po located along the central axis of the disc. Additionally discuss the case where the diameter of the plate is much greater than the distance from the plate.
Solution:
We divide the circular plate o concentric rings. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:charged-plat# center The ring with radius r and width dr see figure produces an electric field dE at a po P with see field of charged ring dE k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ Since the plate is uniformly charged the charge dQ can be expressed in terms of the total charge Q fracdQQ fracdAA fracpi r drpi R^ Longrightarrow dQ Q frac r drR^ where the expression dQ pi r dr is valid in the limit dr to . vspacemm The total electric field can be calculated by adding up the partial contributions of all rings. In the limit dr to this corresponds to the egral: E _^R dE _^R k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ k_C d _^R fracQleftr^+d^right^/ frac r drR^ k_C frac Q dR^ _^R fracrleftr^+d^right^/ dr The antiderivative of the function fr fracrleftr^+d^right^/ is given by Fr -fracleftr^+d^right^/ as can be verified by taking the derivative of Fr: F'rfr. It follows for the electric field E k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftr^+d^right^/right_^R k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftR^+d^right^/+fracleftd^right^/right k_C frac Q dR^ left fracd-fracsqrtR^+d^right k_C frac QR^ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right With k_C /pi varepsilon_ this can be written as Ed fracQpi R^varepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracvarepsilon_ fracQA left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracsigmavarepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right with the surface charge density sigmaQ/A. vspacemm If R gg d the second term in the parentheses ts to zero since R/d ts to infinity. The field can thus be approximated as E &approx fracsigmavarepsilon_ This means that the field of an infinetly large plate does not dep on the distance from the plate.
Meta Information
Exercise:
A circular plate carries a uniform charge distribution with a total charge of Q. Derive a formal expression for the electric field at a po located along the central axis of the disc. Additionally discuss the case where the diameter of the plate is much greater than the distance from the plate.
Solution:
We divide the circular plate o concentric rings. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:charged-plat# center The ring with radius r and width dr see figure produces an electric field dE at a po P with see field of charged ring dE k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ Since the plate is uniformly charged the charge dQ can be expressed in terms of the total charge Q fracdQQ fracdAA fracpi r drpi R^ Longrightarrow dQ Q frac r drR^ where the expression dQ pi r dr is valid in the limit dr to . vspacemm The total electric field can be calculated by adding up the partial contributions of all rings. In the limit dr to this corresponds to the egral: E _^R dE _^R k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ k_C d _^R fracQleftr^+d^right^/ frac r drR^ k_C frac Q dR^ _^R fracrleftr^+d^right^/ dr The antiderivative of the function fr fracrleftr^+d^right^/ is given by Fr -fracleftr^+d^right^/ as can be verified by taking the derivative of Fr: F'rfr. It follows for the electric field E k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftr^+d^right^/right_^R k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftR^+d^right^/+fracleftd^right^/right k_C frac Q dR^ left fracd-fracsqrtR^+d^right k_C frac QR^ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right With k_C /pi varepsilon_ this can be written as Ed fracQpi R^varepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracvarepsilon_ fracQA left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracsigmavarepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right with the surface charge density sigmaQ/A. vspacemm If R gg d the second term in the parentheses ts to zero since R/d ts to infinity. The field can thus be approximated as E &approx fracsigmavarepsilon_ This means that the field of an infinetly large plate does not dep on the distance from the plate.
A circular plate carries a uniform charge distribution with a total charge of Q. Derive a formal expression for the electric field at a po located along the central axis of the disc. Additionally discuss the case where the diameter of the plate is much greater than the distance from the plate.
Solution:
We divide the circular plate o concentric rings. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:charged-plat# center The ring with radius r and width dr see figure produces an electric field dE at a po P with see field of charged ring dE k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ Since the plate is uniformly charged the charge dQ can be expressed in terms of the total charge Q fracdQQ fracdAA fracpi r drpi R^ Longrightarrow dQ Q frac r drR^ where the expression dQ pi r dr is valid in the limit dr to . vspacemm The total electric field can be calculated by adding up the partial contributions of all rings. In the limit dr to this corresponds to the egral: E _^R dE _^R k_C fracdQ dleftr^+d^right^/ k_C d _^R fracQleftr^+d^right^/ frac r drR^ k_C frac Q dR^ _^R fracrleftr^+d^right^/ dr The antiderivative of the function fr fracrleftr^+d^right^/ is given by Fr -fracleftr^+d^right^/ as can be verified by taking the derivative of Fr: F'rfr. It follows for the electric field E k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftr^+d^right^/right_^R k_C frac Q dR^ left -fracleftR^+d^right^/+fracleftd^right^/right k_C frac Q dR^ left fracd-fracsqrtR^+d^right k_C frac QR^ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right With k_C /pi varepsilon_ this can be written as Ed fracQpi R^varepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracvarepsilon_ fracQA left -fracsqrt+R/d^right fracsigmavarepsilon_ left -fracsqrt+R/d^right with the surface charge density sigmaQ/A. vspacemm If R gg d the second term in the parentheses ts to zero since R/d ts to infinity. The field can thus be approximated as E &approx fracsigmavarepsilon_ This means that the field of an infinetly large plate does not dep on the distance from the plate.
Contained in these collections:
-
-
Electric Field by by

