Charged Wire
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
A wire with length ell is uniformly charged constant linear charge density lambda. abcliste abc Show that the electric field at a po on the perpicular bisector of the wire is given by Er k_c fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^+r^ where r is the distance of the observation po from the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center Verify that for r ll ell this ts to Er fracpi varepsilon_ fraclambdar abc Derive the formal expression for the electric field at a po on the line defined by the wire outside the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc In order to calculate the electric field at the given po we have to divide the wire o infinitesimally small segments that can be treated as po charges textdq. The partial electric field produced by such a segment is see figure: center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wirsolution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqd^ k_C fractextdqr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ where in the last step we have used that the linear charge density is lambda textdq/textdx. vspacemm Because of the symmetry of the situation we only have to consider the y-component of the field the x-component is cancelled by the contribution of a segment on the right side of the wire. Using similar triangles we find fractextdE_ytextdE fracrd Longrightarrow textdE_y fracrd textdE fracrsqrtr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ k_C lambda r fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The total field corresponds to the egral along the wire: Er _-ell/^+ell/ textdE_y k_C lambda r _-ell/^+ell/ fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The antiderivative of fx fracleftr^+x^right^/ is given by the function Fx fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ as can be verified by showing that F'x fx. It follows for the electric field Er k_C lambda r left fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda fracellrleftr^+ell/^right^/ k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtr^+ell/^ quad square For ell gg r the first term in the square root can be neglected so E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^ k_C fraclambda ellr fracell k_C fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar quad square abc The partial electric field produced by an infinetisimal segment is see figure center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wiraxis-solution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqleft r-x right^ k_C fraclambdaleft r-x right^ textdx It follows for the total field Er k_C lambda _-ell/^+ell/ fracleft r-x right^ textdx k_C lambda left fracr-x right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda left fracr-ell/ - fracr+ell/ right k_C lambda fracr+ell/ - r + ell/r-ell/r+ell/ k_C fraclambda ellr^-ell/^ For r gg ell the second term in the denominator can be neglected and we find E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr^ k_C fracQr^ where Q is the total charge on the wire. As expected far from a charged wire with finite length the field is approximately equal to the field of a po charge with the same charge. abcliste
A wire with length ell is uniformly charged constant linear charge density lambda. abcliste abc Show that the electric field at a po on the perpicular bisector of the wire is given by Er k_c fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^+r^ where r is the distance of the observation po from the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center Verify that for r ll ell this ts to Er fracpi varepsilon_ fraclambdar abc Derive the formal expression for the electric field at a po on the line defined by the wire outside the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc In order to calculate the electric field at the given po we have to divide the wire o infinitesimally small segments that can be treated as po charges textdq. The partial electric field produced by such a segment is see figure: center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wirsolution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqd^ k_C fractextdqr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ where in the last step we have used that the linear charge density is lambda textdq/textdx. vspacemm Because of the symmetry of the situation we only have to consider the y-component of the field the x-component is cancelled by the contribution of a segment on the right side of the wire. Using similar triangles we find fractextdE_ytextdE fracrd Longrightarrow textdE_y fracrd textdE fracrsqrtr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ k_C lambda r fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The total field corresponds to the egral along the wire: Er _-ell/^+ell/ textdE_y k_C lambda r _-ell/^+ell/ fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The antiderivative of fx fracleftr^+x^right^/ is given by the function Fx fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ as can be verified by showing that F'x fx. It follows for the electric field Er k_C lambda r left fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda fracellrleftr^+ell/^right^/ k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtr^+ell/^ quad square For ell gg r the first term in the square root can be neglected so E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^ k_C fraclambda ellr fracell k_C fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar quad square abc The partial electric field produced by an infinetisimal segment is see figure center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wiraxis-solution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqleft r-x right^ k_C fraclambdaleft r-x right^ textdx It follows for the total field Er k_C lambda _-ell/^+ell/ fracleft r-x right^ textdx k_C lambda left fracr-x right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda left fracr-ell/ - fracr+ell/ right k_C lambda fracr+ell/ - r + ell/r-ell/r+ell/ k_C fraclambda ellr^-ell/^ For r gg ell the second term in the denominator can be neglected and we find E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr^ k_C fracQr^ where Q is the total charge on the wire. As expected far from a charged wire with finite length the field is approximately equal to the field of a po charge with the same charge. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
A wire with length ell is uniformly charged constant linear charge density lambda. abcliste abc Show that the electric field at a po on the perpicular bisector of the wire is given by Er k_c fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^+r^ where r is the distance of the observation po from the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center Verify that for r ll ell this ts to Er fracpi varepsilon_ fraclambdar abc Derive the formal expression for the electric field at a po on the line defined by the wire outside the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc In order to calculate the electric field at the given po we have to divide the wire o infinitesimally small segments that can be treated as po charges textdq. The partial electric field produced by such a segment is see figure: center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wirsolution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqd^ k_C fractextdqr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ where in the last step we have used that the linear charge density is lambda textdq/textdx. vspacemm Because of the symmetry of the situation we only have to consider the y-component of the field the x-component is cancelled by the contribution of a segment on the right side of the wire. Using similar triangles we find fractextdE_ytextdE fracrd Longrightarrow textdE_y fracrd textdE fracrsqrtr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ k_C lambda r fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The total field corresponds to the egral along the wire: Er _-ell/^+ell/ textdE_y k_C lambda r _-ell/^+ell/ fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The antiderivative of fx fracleftr^+x^right^/ is given by the function Fx fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ as can be verified by showing that F'x fx. It follows for the electric field Er k_C lambda r left fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda fracellrleftr^+ell/^right^/ k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtr^+ell/^ quad square For ell gg r the first term in the square root can be neglected so E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^ k_C fraclambda ellr fracell k_C fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar quad square abc The partial electric field produced by an infinetisimal segment is see figure center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wiraxis-solution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqleft r-x right^ k_C fraclambdaleft r-x right^ textdx It follows for the total field Er k_C lambda _-ell/^+ell/ fracleft r-x right^ textdx k_C lambda left fracr-x right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda left fracr-ell/ - fracr+ell/ right k_C lambda fracr+ell/ - r + ell/r-ell/r+ell/ k_C fraclambda ellr^-ell/^ For r gg ell the second term in the denominator can be neglected and we find E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr^ k_C fracQr^ where Q is the total charge on the wire. As expected far from a charged wire with finite length the field is approximately equal to the field of a po charge with the same charge. abcliste
A wire with length ell is uniformly charged constant linear charge density lambda. abcliste abc Show that the electric field at a po on the perpicular bisector of the wire is given by Er k_c fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^+r^ where r is the distance of the observation po from the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center Verify that for r ll ell this ts to Er fracpi varepsilon_ fraclambdar abc Derive the formal expression for the electric field at a po on the line defined by the wire outside the wire. center includegraphicswidth.mm#image_path:longitudinal-setup-# center abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc In order to calculate the electric field at the given po we have to divide the wire o infinitesimally small segments that can be treated as po charges textdq. The partial electric field produced by such a segment is see figure: center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wirsolution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqd^ k_C fractextdqr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ where in the last step we have used that the linear charge density is lambda textdq/textdx. vspacemm Because of the symmetry of the situation we only have to consider the y-component of the field the x-component is cancelled by the contribution of a segment on the right side of the wire. Using similar triangles we find fractextdE_ytextdE fracrd Longrightarrow textdE_y fracrd textdE fracrsqrtr^+x^ k_C fraclambda textdxr^+x^ k_C lambda r fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The total field corresponds to the egral along the wire: Er _-ell/^+ell/ textdE_y k_C lambda r _-ell/^+ell/ fracleftr^+x^right^/ textdx The antiderivative of fx fracleftr^+x^right^/ is given by the function Fx fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ as can be verified by showing that F'x fx. It follows for the electric field Er k_C lambda r left fracxr^leftr^+x^right^/ right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda fracellrleftr^+ell/^right^/ k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtr^+ell/^ quad square For ell gg r the first term in the square root can be neglected so E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr fracsqrtell/^ k_C fraclambda ellr fracell k_C fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar fracpivarepsilon_ fraclambdar quad square abc The partial electric field produced by an infinetisimal segment is see figure center includegraphicswidthtextwidth#image_path:field-of-charged-wiraxis-solution-# center textdE k_C fractextdqleft r-x right^ k_C fraclambdaleft r-x right^ textdx It follows for the total field Er k_C lambda _-ell/^+ell/ fracleft r-x right^ textdx k_C lambda left fracr-x right_-ell/^+ell/ k_C lambda left fracr-ell/ - fracr+ell/ right k_C lambda fracr+ell/ - r + ell/r-ell/r+ell/ k_C fraclambda ellr^-ell/^ For r gg ell the second term in the denominator can be neglected and we find E &approx k_C fraclambda ellr^ k_C fracQr^ where Q is the total charge on the wire. As expected far from a charged wire with finite length the field is approximately equal to the field of a po charge with the same charge. abcliste
Contained in these collections:

