Expectation value and uncertainty
About points...
We associate a certain number of points with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as points for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit the number of points for the exercise in the collection independently, without any effect on "points by default" as represented by the number here.
That being said... How many "default points" should you associate with an exercise upon creation?
As with difficulty, there is no straight forward and generally accepted way.
But as a guideline, we tend to give as many points by default as there are mathematical steps to do in the exercise.
Again, very vague... But the number should kind of represent the "work" required.
About difficulty...
We associate a certain difficulty with each exercise.
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
When you click an exercise into a collection, this number will be taken as difficulty for the exercise, kind of "by default".
But once the exercise is on the collection, you can edit its difficulty in the collection independently, without any effect on the "difficulty by default" here.
Why we use chess pieces? Well... we like chess, we like playing around with \(\LaTeX\)-fonts, we wanted symbols that need less space than six stars in a table-column... But in your layouts, you are of course free to indicate the difficulty of the exercise the way you want.
That being said... How "difficult" is an exercise? It depends on many factors, like what was being taught etc.
In physics exercises, we try to follow this pattern:
Level 1 - One formula (one you would find in a reference book) is enough to solve the exercise. Example exercise
Level 2 - Two formulas are needed, it's possible to compute an "in-between" solution, i.e. no algebraic equation needed. Example exercise
Level 3 - "Chain-computations" like on level 2, but 3+ calculations. Still, no equations, i.e. you are not forced to solve it in an algebraic manner. Example exercise
Level 4 - Exercise needs to be solved by algebraic equations, not possible to calculate numerical "in-between" results. Example exercise
Level 5 -
Level 6 -
Question
Solution
Short
Video
\(\LaTeX\)
No explanation / solution video to this exercise has yet been created.
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Visit our YouTube-Channel to see solutions to other exercises.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel, like the videos and leave comments!
Exercise:
abcliste abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for the energy of an energy eigenstate of a particle in an infinite potential well? abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for a superposition of ground state and first excited state: psixt fracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xt abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The expectation value for the energy of the energy eigenstate psi_nx t is langle hat E rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t psi_nx t textdx E_n abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n where we have used the fact that the wavefunction is normalised. As expected the expectation value of an energy eigenstate corresponds to the energy level corresponding to that state. vspacemm The expectation value for langle hat E^ rangle_n can be derived in a similar way: langle E^ rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E^ psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t hat E lefthat E psi_nx t right textdx psi^*_nx t hat E leftE_n psi_nx tright textdx E_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n^ abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n^ It follows for the standard deviation sigma sqrtlangle hat E^ rangle_n - leftlangle hat E rangle_nright^ sqrtE_n^ - E_n^ The energy of the energy eigenstate psi_n is exactly E_n. abc Applying the energy operator to the superposition state yields hat E psix t hat E leftfracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xtright fracsqrthat E psi_x t + fracsqrthat E psi_xt fracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt It follows for the expectation value of the energy langle hat E rangle psi^*x t hat E psix t textdx leftfracsqrtpsi_^*x t + fracsqrtpsi_^*xtright leftfracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt right textdx Because of the orthonormality of the eigenstates we know that psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx The only relevant terms are thus fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ and fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ The expectation value is thus langle hat E rangle fracE_ + fracE_ fracE_+E_ Since the probabilities for the two eigenstates in the superposition are both equal to % this result is as expected. vspacemm In order to calculate the standard deviation we also have to determine the expectation value of the operator hat E^. This can be done in the same way as above but with the squares of the respective energy values. It follows that langle hat E^ rangle fracE_^ + fracE_^ fracE_^+E_^ The variance is therefore sigma^ langle hat E^ rangle - langle hat E rangle^ fracE_^+E_^ - leftfracE_+E_right^ frac E_^ + E_^ - fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_ - E_^ For the standard deviation we find the following expression: sigma fracE_-E_ The standard deviation for the superposition of two energy eigenstates with the same probability of % corresponds to half the difference between the correpsonding energy values which is again quite uitive. abcliste
abcliste abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for the energy of an energy eigenstate of a particle in an infinite potential well? abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for a superposition of ground state and first excited state: psixt fracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xt abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The expectation value for the energy of the energy eigenstate psi_nx t is langle hat E rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t psi_nx t textdx E_n abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n where we have used the fact that the wavefunction is normalised. As expected the expectation value of an energy eigenstate corresponds to the energy level corresponding to that state. vspacemm The expectation value for langle hat E^ rangle_n can be derived in a similar way: langle E^ rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E^ psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t hat E lefthat E psi_nx t right textdx psi^*_nx t hat E leftE_n psi_nx tright textdx E_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n^ abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n^ It follows for the standard deviation sigma sqrtlangle hat E^ rangle_n - leftlangle hat E rangle_nright^ sqrtE_n^ - E_n^ The energy of the energy eigenstate psi_n is exactly E_n. abc Applying the energy operator to the superposition state yields hat E psix t hat E leftfracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xtright fracsqrthat E psi_x t + fracsqrthat E psi_xt fracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt It follows for the expectation value of the energy langle hat E rangle psi^*x t hat E psix t textdx leftfracsqrtpsi_^*x t + fracsqrtpsi_^*xtright leftfracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt right textdx Because of the orthonormality of the eigenstates we know that psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx The only relevant terms are thus fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ and fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ The expectation value is thus langle hat E rangle fracE_ + fracE_ fracE_+E_ Since the probabilities for the two eigenstates in the superposition are both equal to % this result is as expected. vspacemm In order to calculate the standard deviation we also have to determine the expectation value of the operator hat E^. This can be done in the same way as above but with the squares of the respective energy values. It follows that langle hat E^ rangle fracE_^ + fracE_^ fracE_^+E_^ The variance is therefore sigma^ langle hat E^ rangle - langle hat E rangle^ fracE_^+E_^ - leftfracE_+E_right^ frac E_^ + E_^ - fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_ - E_^ For the standard deviation we find the following expression: sigma fracE_-E_ The standard deviation for the superposition of two energy eigenstates with the same probability of % corresponds to half the difference between the correpsonding energy values which is again quite uitive. abcliste
Meta Information
Exercise:
abcliste abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for the energy of an energy eigenstate of a particle in an infinite potential well? abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for a superposition of ground state and first excited state: psixt fracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xt abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The expectation value for the energy of the energy eigenstate psi_nx t is langle hat E rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t psi_nx t textdx E_n abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n where we have used the fact that the wavefunction is normalised. As expected the expectation value of an energy eigenstate corresponds to the energy level corresponding to that state. vspacemm The expectation value for langle hat E^ rangle_n can be derived in a similar way: langle E^ rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E^ psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t hat E lefthat E psi_nx t right textdx psi^*_nx t hat E leftE_n psi_nx tright textdx E_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n^ abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n^ It follows for the standard deviation sigma sqrtlangle hat E^ rangle_n - leftlangle hat E rangle_nright^ sqrtE_n^ - E_n^ The energy of the energy eigenstate psi_n is exactly E_n. abc Applying the energy operator to the superposition state yields hat E psix t hat E leftfracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xtright fracsqrthat E psi_x t + fracsqrthat E psi_xt fracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt It follows for the expectation value of the energy langle hat E rangle psi^*x t hat E psix t textdx leftfracsqrtpsi_^*x t + fracsqrtpsi_^*xtright leftfracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt right textdx Because of the orthonormality of the eigenstates we know that psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx The only relevant terms are thus fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ and fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ The expectation value is thus langle hat E rangle fracE_ + fracE_ fracE_+E_ Since the probabilities for the two eigenstates in the superposition are both equal to % this result is as expected. vspacemm In order to calculate the standard deviation we also have to determine the expectation value of the operator hat E^. This can be done in the same way as above but with the squares of the respective energy values. It follows that langle hat E^ rangle fracE_^ + fracE_^ fracE_^+E_^ The variance is therefore sigma^ langle hat E^ rangle - langle hat E rangle^ fracE_^+E_^ - leftfracE_+E_right^ frac E_^ + E_^ - fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_ - E_^ For the standard deviation we find the following expression: sigma fracE_-E_ The standard deviation for the superposition of two energy eigenstates with the same probability of % corresponds to half the difference between the correpsonding energy values which is again quite uitive. abcliste
abcliste abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for the energy of an energy eigenstate of a particle in an infinite potential well? abc What is the expectation value and the uncertay for a superposition of ground state and first excited state: psixt fracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xt abcliste
Solution:
abcliste abc The expectation value for the energy of the energy eigenstate psi_nx t is langle hat E rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t psi_nx t textdx E_n abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n where we have used the fact that the wavefunction is normalised. As expected the expectation value of an energy eigenstate corresponds to the energy level corresponding to that state. vspacemm The expectation value for langle hat E^ rangle_n can be derived in a similar way: langle E^ rangle_n psi^*_nx t hat E^ psi_nx t textdx psi^*_nx t hat E lefthat E psi_nx t right textdx psi^*_nx t hat E leftE_n psi_nx tright textdx E_n psi^*_nx t hat E psi_nx t textdx E_n psi^*_nx t E_n psi_nx t textdx E_n^ abspsi_nx t^ textdx E_n^ It follows for the standard deviation sigma sqrtlangle hat E^ rangle_n - leftlangle hat E rangle_nright^ sqrtE_n^ - E_n^ The energy of the energy eigenstate psi_n is exactly E_n. abc Applying the energy operator to the superposition state yields hat E psix t hat E leftfracsqrtpsi_x t + fracsqrtpsi_xtright fracsqrthat E psi_x t + fracsqrthat E psi_xt fracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt It follows for the expectation value of the energy langle hat E rangle psi^*x t hat E psix t textdx leftfracsqrtpsi_^*x t + fracsqrtpsi_^*xtright leftfracsqrtE_ psi_x t + fracsqrtE_ psi_xt right textdx Because of the orthonormality of the eigenstates we know that psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx psi^*_x t psi_x t textdx The only relevant terms are thus fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ and fracsqrtpsi_^*x t fracsqrtE_ psi_x t textdx fracE_ psi_^*x t psi_x t textdx fracE_ The expectation value is thus langle hat E rangle fracE_ + fracE_ fracE_+E_ Since the probabilities for the two eigenstates in the superposition are both equal to % this result is as expected. vspacemm In order to calculate the standard deviation we also have to determine the expectation value of the operator hat E^. This can be done in the same way as above but with the squares of the respective energy values. It follows that langle hat E^ rangle fracE_^ + fracE_^ fracE_^+E_^ The variance is therefore sigma^ langle hat E^ rangle - langle hat E rangle^ fracE_^+E_^ - leftfracE_+E_right^ frac E_^ + E_^ - fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_^ + E_^ - E_ E_ fracE_ - E_^ For the standard deviation we find the following expression: sigma fracE_-E_ The standard deviation for the superposition of two energy eigenstates with the same probability of % corresponds to half the difference between the correpsonding energy values which is again quite uitive. abcliste
Contained in these collections:

